Paper should be a first-person personal statement about myself, my strong passion for becoming an trial attorney and protecting the rights of others, my strong work ethic as both a retail business owner & rental property owner at the age of 24 and also how those things have allowed me to be exposed to and a number of elements of the legal field such as writing rental contracts, employee management and the filing of necessary paperwork with the state and tax agencies. I have attached a brief summary about myself and resume, the same information provided to those writing my letters of recommendation so feel free to use and info here in producing my personal statement.
Category: Law
Paper should be a first-person personal statement about myself, my strong passion for becoming an trial attorney and protecting the rights of others, my strong work ethic as both a retail business owner & rental property owner at the age of 24 and also how those things have allowed me to be exposed to and a number of elements of the legal field such as writing rental contracts, employee management and the filing of necessary paperwork with the state and tax agencies. I have attached a brief summary about myself and resume, the same information provided to those writing my letters of recommendation so feel free to use and info here in producing my personal statement.
I need arguments and case law regarding Supreme Court and EEOC Appeals for the following below.
1.Opposition Reprisal (Supreme Court preferably and EEOC appeals case law reference).
2. Regarded as having a disability case law.
3. Case law regarding being forced to submit Reasonable accommodations by employers although they were not sought, nor asked, nor needed. How that is discriminatory
4.Grooming policies are discriminatory case law for African American males with PFB.
(Please utilize Supreme Court or EEOC Appeals for all the above)
Create a post of a minimum of 250 words answering the below discussion points (found immediately below the following instructions).
Discussion Topic 1—(Contributory Negligence—Should It Be Changed?)
No unread replies.No replies.
Maryland and 4 other jurisdictions, of 51 (50 states plus D.C.) use contributory negligence. The other 46 jurisdictions use comparative negligence, either pure or modified.
In November of 2010, Court of Appeals Chief Judge Robert M. Bell sent a letter to the Judiciary’s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to determine how a change could be made ”…if the Court were to consider replacing the doctrine of contributory negligence, a common law doctrine in Maryland, with some sort of comparative fault.”
In February 2011, Delegate Benjamin F. Kramer introduced a bill which would require, by statute, that Maryland continue to use contributory negligence. It did not pass.
On April 15, 2011, the Rules Committee issued its report which recommended no change be made by rule and further indicated, if any change were to be made, it should properly be made by either the Maryland Legislature or by a Court of Appeals case.
Other states have used one of these two methods.
On September 10, 2012, the Court of Appeals of Maryland heard oral arguments in the case of Coleman v. Soccer Association of Columbia on the topic. You must watch a Webcast of the arguments by Googling Maryland Courts, then to Courts at the top of the page, then to Court of Appeals, then to Webcasts, then to Oral Argument Archives, then to September 2012 term, then scroll all the way down to the Coleman case (No. 9) on 9-10-2012. When you watch you can hear arguments on both sides of the issue.
Here is a link: https://youtu.be/dkOX4u1YOSI
Use your cursor to slide the progress bar back to the beginning of the oral arguments.
During the oral arguments you will hear the term, UCATA. This is the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act.
The opinions were filed on July 9, 2013. You must read the opinions of the Coleman case (there are 3—one majority, one dissenting and one concurring) and decide which you support.
Here is the link to the opinions: https://mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2013/9a12.pdf
You can also use Google to help find information, both pro and con, to help you form an opinion.
Discussion Points:
Do you believe the Maryland Legislature should change from contributory negligence to comparative negligence and more importantly, why?
And also, if your answer is yes, which type—pure or modified—would you choose, and why?
Lastly, what was your impression of the oral arguments in the Court of Appeals?
Create a post of a minimum of 250 words answering the below discussion points (found immediately below the following instructions).
Discussion Topic 1—(Contributory Negligence—Should It Be Changed?)
No unread replies.No replies.
Maryland and 4 other jurisdictions, of 51 (50 states plus D.C.) use contributory negligence. The other 46 jurisdictions use comparative negligence, either pure or modified.
In November of 2010, Court of Appeals Chief Judge Robert M. Bell sent a letter to the Judiciary’s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to determine how a change could be made ”…if the Court were to consider replacing the doctrine of contributory negligence, a common law doctrine in Maryland, with some sort of comparative fault.”
In February 2011, Delegate Benjamin F. Kramer introduced a bill which would require, by statute, that Maryland continue to use contributory negligence. It did not pass.
On April 15, 2011, the Rules Committee issued its report which recommended no change be made by rule and further indicated, if any change were to be made, it should properly be made by either the Maryland Legislature or by a Court of Appeals case.
Other states have used one of these two methods.
On September 10, 2012, the Court of Appeals of Maryland heard oral arguments in the case of Coleman v. Soccer Association of Columbia on the topic. You must watch a Webcast of the arguments by Googling Maryland Courts, then to Courts at the top of the page, then to Court of Appeals, then to Webcasts, then to Oral Argument Archives, then to September 2012 term, then scroll all the way down to the Coleman case (No. 9) on 9-10-2012. When you watch you can hear arguments on both sides of the issue.
Here is a link: https://youtu.be/dkOX4u1YOSI
Use your cursor to slide the progress bar back to the beginning of the oral arguments.
During the oral arguments you will hear the term, UCATA. This is the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act.
The opinions were filed on July 9, 2013. You must read the opinions of the Coleman case (there are 3—one majority, one dissenting and one concurring) and decide which you support.
Here is the link to the opinions: https://mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2013/9a12.pdf
You can also use Google to help find information, both pro and con, to help you form an opinion.
Discussion Points:
Do you believe the Maryland Legislature should change from contributory negligence to comparative negligence and more importantly, why?
And also, if your answer is yes, which type—pure or modified—would you choose, and why?
Lastly, what was your impression of the oral arguments in the Court of Appeals?
Your company has received a valid contract offer. If you accept this offer you will be able to purchase a large amount of wheat, but, you are uncertain about what market conditions will be in the near future. You need two weeks to do adequate market research before you can accept or reject the current offer. At the same time you are award that the person who extended the offer to you is in conversation with other potential buyers. Your boss asks you if the current offer has to be kept open until you make a decision to accept or reject the offer. Alternately, is there a way the current offer can be made irrevocable during the next two weeks. If there is a way to do this, how should your company go about doing that?
Please mention USA contract law
How do courts decide who is an employee and who is an independent contractor? What are the positive and negative issues that are associated with being either an employee or and independent contractor? What are the risks associated with being an independent contractor? Use the Library or other Web resources to support your answer.
Learning Goal: I’m working on a law multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Read in the textbook: Joshua Dressler, UNDERSTANDING CRIMINAL LAW (8th ed. 2018) – Chapters 11, 32-33.
A police officer responded to a break in at a convenience store. When the officer arrived, she observed the store’s window had been broken and that numerous unopened cigarette packages were strewn all over the ground. The officer located A, the thief, and arrested him. At the time A was apprehended, he had numerous unopened cigarette packages on his person. A was charged with the theft of goods worth more than $200. The prosecutor valued the theft at over $200 because the value of the cigarette packages on A’s person, as well as the packages that were located on the store’s floor, exceeded $200. The prosecutor theorized that A entered the store, grabbed multiple cigarette packages at once and inadvertently dropped some on his way out of the store. The prosecutor’s theory was bolstered when the store’s owner testified he did not leave cigarette packages on the store’s floor when he locked up for the night. A was convicted of larceny. On appeal A argues there was no proof he moved any of the cigarette packages that were found on the floor. You are an appellate judge who is assigned to the case. Is there any proof of asportation of the cigarette packages found on the store’s floor?
Learning Goal: I’m working on a law multi-part question and need a sample draft to help me learn.
Directions: Answer each question below with complete and logical sentences (not sentence fragments), using material from the lesson content to support your answer (e.g., your answers should not be “I think,” “I feel,” “yes,” or “no” statements without some additional explanation or analysis of the lesson content). Enter your answers in this word document after each corresponding question, save, and submit this as a word document (i.e., not as a PDF, pages, etc.) to Blackboard by the due date.
1.You are the airport manager of a city-owned public airport. The airport’s development has been partially funded through federal grants. The airport authority, your boss, asks you the following questions
a.Is there any restriction on what limitations we can impose on the use of our airport? (1 point)
b.Would there be any potential adverse legal consequences if we decide to close the airport and use the property for other purposes? (1 point)
2.Identify and describe at least two current efforts to accomplish the safe and efficient integration of civil UAS into the US National Airspace System (online research beyond the course material will be necessary) (1 point)
3.You are an airline passenger. During pre-boarding screening, a very annoying TSA employee asks you to open your wallet.
a.Is this a reasonable search? Explain. (1 point)
b.Your immediate urge is to respond sarcastically, saying something like: “Oh, that’s where I hid the machine gun I was going to use to hijack the flight.” Explain what adverse legal consequences could result from such a remark? (1 point)
Learning Goal: I’m working on a law question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
What rights should prisoners have vs what they currently have, what does the future hold for correctional facilities?
Include the following aspects in the assignment:
● Are prisoner rights too lenient considering they are in prison?
● What rights should they have?
● Are programs in prison too much and they should suffer instead?
Your presentation may take the form of a two-page word document or a 10 slide PowerPoint presentation. Use APA formatting in whichever one you chose. The word document should have a cover page and reference page which do not count towards the two-page requirement. The PowerPoint presentation should have a cover slide and a reference slide which do not count towards the total slide count.
In-text citations are required and one (1) website from a blog, newspaper, business magazine, etc will be accepted. Textbook and peer-reviewed journal articles are required.